Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!njin!princeton!phoenix.princeton.edu!rlwald
From: rlwald@phoenix.princeton.edu (Rob Wald)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.games
Subject: Re: Risk
Message-ID: <4255@idunno.Princeton.EDU>
Date: 26 Nov 90 09:51:57 GMT
References: <15722@reed.UUCP>
Sender: news@idunno.Princeton.EDU
Organization: Princeton University
Lines: 16

In article <15722@reed.UUCP> orpheus@reed.UUCP (Aaron Semplers) writes:
>      Its funny that the Amiga, hybrid product that it is, has such
> good graphics. It seems to me that the Amiga advantage is the number
> of hacks who have been able to afford it over the years, unlike Macs.

  I don't think anyone wants to get into a discussion, so I won't ask 
about how
the Amiga is a hybrid product. But the reason it has good graphical games 
is because
it has some co-processors to handle graphics that provide advanced 
features which
aren't really available on the Mac. 



104% of all statistics are wrong.