Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!sics.se!ollef From: ollef@sics.se (Olle Furberg) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hypercard Subject: FONTs in stack: what's bad? Message-ID: <1990Nov28.180031.677@sics.se> Date: 28 Nov 90 18:00:31 GMT Sender: news@sics.se Organization: Swedish Institute of Computer Science, Kista Lines: 40 There has been some postings concerning FONT-resources in stacks: In <18615@unix.SRI.COM> mxmora@unix.SRI.COM (Matt Mora) writes: >Apple recommends that you don't include fonts in any documents. And since >a stack is just a document Apple recommends not putting them into a stack >either. In <37407@nigel.ee.udel.edu> johnston@oscar.ccm.udel.edu writes: >Does anyone have any thoughts on the _appropriateness_ of including >fonts with a stack? Not in the stack, that's taboo, apparently. But I can't understand this. I thought it was an accepted way to assure that the user has the resources he needs. In the Apple publication "Technical Introduction to the Macintosh Family" (ISBN 0-201-17765-X) on page 74 you could read: "The resource manager usually searches the files in the reverse order that they were opened..." [i.e. beginning with the document file] "Understanding of this search order makes it easy to share resources among applications and also to override a system resource with a custom resource." And in another Apple publication, "HyperCard Stack Design Guidelines" (ISBN 0-201-51784-1) on page 87: "If you need to use a nonstandard font for text fields, you should either install it into your stack itself, or include it as a separate font resource and instruct the users to install it into their System with the Font/DA Mover utility." If HC 2.0 can't deal with resources in the stack I'll think of it as a rather nasty bug. Besides FONT and FOND resources I also want to put KCHRs into my stacks, I hope this will be supported in future versions of HC.