Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!ohstpy!miavx1!dastrout
From: dastrout@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (root@next1)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: X11R4 addendum
Message-ID: <3012.27559c12@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu>
Date: 30 Nov 90 04:38:58 GMT
Lines: 23

Regarding my comments about X11R4 on the NeXT:
1.  Yes I have it.
2.  What I have has some bugs.
3.  I did not write it.
4.  I cannot give it out.
5.  I expect the people at McGill will announce it when they are done.
6.  X on a NeXT is like t*ts on a boar -- not real useful.  What makes us
     special (better) is NeXTStep.  Anyone can run X, but only a NeXT (or
     RS-6000) can run NeXTStep.  My personal feeling is, X is a neat toy, but
     if you but a NeXT, run NeXTStep. I know not everyone will agree, & I don't
     mean to start a religious war, but I don't want my comment that one CAN
     run X to be taken as though one SHOULD.

-- 
Dave Strout
NeXT Campus Consultant -- Miami University.
-> The above ideas are mine only, unless you like them.  Then they represent
whomever. <-
dastrout@next3.acs.muohio.edu <- Please Reply to!!!

dastrout%miavx1.bitnet@pucc.princeton.edu
root@next1.acs.muohio.edu
513-523-8245