Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!unido!opal!tmpmbx!utopia!sunrise!hotte From: hotte@sunrise.in-berlin.de (Horst Laumer) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: Why does "cal 9 1752" produce incorrect results? Message-ID: Date: 28 Nov 90 09:22:41 GMT References: <3313@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> Organization: HL EDV-Beratung Lines: 22 khenry@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu (Ken Henry) writes: >Does anybody know why "cal 9 1752" produce incorrect >results? It seems to be in the Unix systems I >checked (BSD 4.3, AIX 3.1). You claim that the output is incorrect without posting it here. I think you mock about the 11 days missing, which is a) correct according to the history of mankind b) referenced in the manuals, at least on the AT&T SYSV line. So, before claiming an error, and since you proved the output on several machines, decide who is wrong: the command you issued or your opinion about "what is a bug" ! Sincere HL -- ============================================================================ Horst Laumer, Kantstrasse 107, D-1000 Berlin 12 ! Bang-Adress: A Relict Of Domain: hotte@sunrise.in-berlin.de ! Pre-Routing-Times, When Bang: ...unido!fub!geminix!sunrise!hotte ! Computers Were Unmanagable