Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!jarthur!uunet!dynsim1!vlr From: vlr@litwin.com (Vic Rice) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: SCO's V.4 plans Message-ID: <1990Nov28.025705.5736@litwin.com> Date: 28 Nov 90 02:57:05 GMT References: <1990Nov15.225728.16481@cbnewsm.att.com> <1990Nov17.225432.17394@pegasus.com> <2330@sixhub.UUCP> <1990Nov21.232102.26005@pegasus.com> <152@raysnec.UUCP> Organization: Litwin Process Automation, Houston Lines: 16 shwake@raysnec.UUCP (Ray Shwake) writes: >richard@pegasus.com (Richard Foulk) writes: >>SCO has, so far, promised NOT to go with V.4 -- buzzing about in their own >>separate reality. > As I recall from an SCO presentation at our user group last December, >their stated inclination is to enhance 3.2 with those components or features >from V.4 most in demand. Considering the notable increase in resource Wouldn't the pending release of OSF/1 have some impact on SCO's willingness to work V.4 ? -- Dr. Victor L. Rice Litwin Process Automation