Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!rex!ames!vsi1!indetech!fiver!palowoda
From: palowoda@fiver (Bob Palowoda)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Unix & X-Windows on 386SX
Message-ID: <1990Nov30.025126.12879@fiver>
Date: 30 Nov 90 02:51:26 GMT
References: <2318@tabbs.UUCP>
Organization: Fiver Communications, Fremont, Ca
Lines: 23

From article <2318@tabbs.UUCP>, by aris@tabbs.UUCP (Aris Stathakis):
> In <156@raysnec.UUCP> shwake@raysnec.UUCP (Ray Shwake) writes:
> 
>>palowoda@fiver (Bob Palowoda) writes:
> 
>>> Anyways it is a sad day when
>>>buyers are willing to pay more to take a feature out of product. C2 is
>>>not part of UNIX. It's part of the goverment. I like ISC idea you buy
>>>it in a different package. What's wrong with that. 
> 
> What's wrong with that is that it isn't C2.  The C2 standard states that
> it must be included in the product, and you cannot have the same product
> without the C2 security - or else it does not constitute C2.

  What is the rationale behind this?

---Bob

-- 
Bob Palowoda   palowoda@fiver              |   *Home of Fiver BBS*
Home {sun}!ys2!fiver!palowoda              | 415-623-8809 1200/2400
     {pacbell}!indetech!fiver!palowoda     |     An XBBS System                
Work {sun,pyramid,decwrl}!megatest!palowoda| 415-623-8806 1200/2400/19.2k TB+