Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!rutgers!dorm.rutgers.edu!medici From: medici@dorm.rutgers.edu (Mark Medici) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: Setting the record straight... Message-ID: Date: 28 Nov 90 18:57:34 GMT References: <1990Nov27.023852.1735@micor.UUCP> Distribution: na Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 30 My $0.02. I don't have any problem paying $100.00 for the upgrade to Corel Draw 2.0. Though I don't use the program regularly, when I do use it nothing else will do. The new features represent a substantial improvement to Corel Draw, and are worth the cost of the update. However, I do not agree that the new features warrant an increase in the retail price. While Corel does need to recoup its development costs, this will occur through upgrade fees and new purchases. The price increase sends a message that Corel is not confident it can continue its software division on its existing income. This causes me concern, especially since I believe the higher price will result in less units sold. Competing packages will add features to diminish Draw! 2.x's advantage. If the competition maintains their current price, as I expect they would, new users will likely choose the lower cost package. I would certainly have trouble recommending Draw! to new users at its current price. If this precedent of escalating retail prices turns into continuing policy, I believe Corel will price itself out of the Personal Computer market altogether. The above personal views do not necessarily reflect those of my employers. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark Medici/SysProg3 * Rutgers University/CCIS * medici@elbereth.rutgers.edu ----------------------------------------------------------------------------