Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!boulder!stan!number6!kucharsk From: kucharsk@number6.Solbourne.COM (William Kucharski) Newsgroups: comp.windows.open-look Subject: Re: Framemaker and olwm Message-ID: <1990Nov26.185606.3858@Solbourne.COM> Date: 26 Nov 90 18:56:06 GMT References: Sender: news@Solbourne.COM Organization: Solbourne Computer, Inc., Longmont CO Lines: 19 In article writes: > > |2nd point : I heard a rumour that the OL version of frame would be NeWS-based. > |(i.e. not X-based) I don't know whether this is true... > >Absolutely true, it's written for the NeWS side of OpenWindows. >It is just at the alpha stage now, and we hope to do alpha testing. >It walks & quacks like FrameMaker, only it IS written for OL, so you >have all the civilities like like obvious ways to dismiss dialog >boxes. Oh wonderful. If you want to use X you have to deal with a Motif look and feel, and if you want OpenLook you have to deal with OpenWindows. Lovely -- I think it's time to migrate to Interleaf... ( 1/2 :-) ) -- =============================================================================== | Internet: kucharsk@Solbourne.COM | William Kucharski | | uucp: ...!{boulder,sun,uunet}!stan!kucharsk | Solbourne Computer, Inc. | ===>> Opinions expressed above are MINE, not those of Solbourne Computer. <<===