Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!csus.edu!ucdavis!csusac!unify!Unify.com!grp
From: grp@Unify.com (Greg Pasquariello)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Comparing OLIT and Xt+
Message-ID: <1990Nov29.120940@Unify.com>
Date: 29 Nov 90 20:09:40 GMT
References: <9011282223.AA10287@ssiwest.ssiwest.com>
Sender: news@Unify.Com (news admin)
Reply-To: grp@Unify.com (Greg Pasquariello)
Organization: Unify Corporation, Sacramento, CA, USA
Lines: 37

In article <9011282223.AA10287@ssiwest.ssiwest.com>, young@ssiwest.UUCP
(indi) writes:
> From: young@ssiwest.UUCP (indi)
> Subject: Comparing OLIT and Xt+
> Date: 28 Nov 90 22:23:43 GMT
> Organization: The Internet
> 
> 
> 
> 	Has anyone had the opportunity to work with both AT&T's Xt+
> 	toolkit and Sun's OLIT toolkit?  (Both api's produce OPEN LOOK
> 	style windows.)  

Yes.

>	If so, are there any significant differences
> 	between the two?
> 

No.

> 	In particular are there any problems running a program with 
> 	AT&T's Xt+ that was developed using Sun's OLIT?  Any problems
> 	the other way around?  

Haven't tried this, but it should be OK. You might have problems if
you do any direct Window Manager manipulation, because the two libraries
handle things _slightly_ differently.
> 
> 
> 	___________________________________________________________
> 	indi (Cathy Young)            Supercomputer Systems, Inc
--

---
Greg Pasquariello	
Unify Corporation 	grp@Unify.Com