Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!world!kdg
From: kdg@world.std.com (Keith D Gregory)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.motif
Subject: Resources defined both in CORE and RECTOBJ
Summary: IS this a doc quirk, or are they really defined twice?
Message-ID: <1990Nov25.203108.25166@world.std.com>
Date: 25 Nov 90 20:31:08 GMT
Organization: The World @ Software Tool & Die
Lines: 17


Resources such as XmNancestorSensitive, XmNx, et al, are defined both
as belonging to Core and RectObj (Programmer's Reference, Rev 1.0).

My question is: Are these really defined for both widget classes, or
is it a documentation quirk?

My feeling is that they are defined twice, so that XmGadget inherits
from RectObj, but Core has its own.  This feeling comes from slight
differences in the documentation for these resources.

So, what is the answer?  Is it a documentation quirk or a design point.
Any background would certainly be helpful for my purposes.

Please mail to me and I'll summarize.
Thanks,
-kdg