Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!acsu.buffalo.edu
From: pjg@acsu.buffalo.edu (Paul Graham)
Newsgroups: news.software.b
Subject: Re: REPLY: Why use NN when there is TRN???
Message-ID: <47424@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>
Date: 24 Nov 90 04:41:11 GMT
References: <1990Nov23.160854.13868@vlsi.polymtl.ca> <1990Nov23.231305.5312@nstar.rn.com>
Sender: news@acsu.Buffalo.EDU
Organization: University at Buffalo
Lines: 15
Nntp-Posting-Host: urth.acsu.buffalo.edu

larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
|scoob@vlsi.polymtl.ca (Christian Marcotte) writes:
|>	News reading is now REALLY EFFICIENT  thanks to TRN !!!
|what does trn offer over nn?  We've been running nn now for almost
|a year - without any problems --

i've posted my perspective over in news.software.nn
i'd prefer nn with threads but at the moment it's an 80/20 split trn/nn.

i imagine that to some folks threaded reading is no big deal, for some
of us though news is infinitely more manageable with threads.

-- 
pjg@acsu.buffalo.edu / rutgers!ub!pjg / pjg@ubvms (Bitnet)
opinions found above are mine unless marked otherwise.