Xref: utzoo news.software.nn:1329 news.software.b:6241
Path: utzoo!utstat!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!grumbly!duc
From: duc@grumbly.UUCP (Richard Ducoty)
Newsgroups: news.software.nn,news.software.b
Subject: Re: REPLY: Why use NN when there is TRN???
Message-ID: <14@grumbly.UUCP>
Date: 24 Nov 90 18:09:01 GMT
References: <1990Nov23.160854.13868@vlsi.polymtl.ca>
Followup-To: news.software.nn
Organization: Pleasure Point Night Fighters
Lines: 24

scoob@vlsi.polymtl.ca (Christian Marcotte) writes:


>  Since the only responses I got from my question: "Why use NN when there
>  is TRN?" were people asking me where I could get TRN, I decided to 
>  advertise this FINE product a bit...

>  TRN IS THE BEST THING THAT HAPPENED TO USENET SINCE NNTP & CNEWS !!!
=======================================

I just got off the phone to God, he and I agree - nn is much better than
trn.  We have used both - no contest.

The reason rn is the 'most popular' is that it's packed along with the
news much of the time.  People, being the cheap, lazy creatures, 
don't always expend the extra effort to get a decent reader.

Off the record - you're going to spend a couple extra weeks in
Purgatory if you keep using trn/rn.


\\\
 - -   Richard Ducoty                                ..uunet!grumbly!duc
 _]    Capitola, California                            duc@grumbly.com