Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!mit-eddie!thakur From: bhanafee@ADS.COM (Brian Hanafee) Newsgroups: rec.arts.cinema Subject: Re: NC-17 controversies Message-ID: <1990Nov29.222832.11821@eddie.mit.edu> Date: 29 Nov 90 22:28:32 GMT References: <1990Nov27.205705.5453@eddie.mit.edu> <1990Nov29.062845.10281@eddie.mit.edu> <1990Nov29.193335.3766@eddie.mit.edu> Sender: thakur@eddie.mit.edu (Manavendra K. Thakur) Reply-To: bhanafee@ADS.COM (Brian Hanafee) Followup-To: rec.arts.cinema Organization: Advanced Decision Systems, Mtn. View, CA (415) 960-7300 Lines: 34 Approved: thakur@zerkalo.harvard.edu In article <1990Nov29.193335.3766@eddie.mit.edu> reiher@onyx.jpl.nasa.gov (Peter Reiher) writes: > >In article <1990Nov29.062845.10281@eddie.mit.edu> pauls@tellabs.com (Paul Silver) writes: >> >>A third possibility is that the MPAA could refuse to rate the porn >>film. Just because a film is submitted for a rating does not mean >>that the MPAA is required to give it a rating. It just returns the >>producer's fee and tells him they will not rate it. He then is forced >>to give it an X rating, or try to release it unrated, which now >>amounts to the same thing. > >Do you have any actual knowledge that the MPAA can or would do this? >Everything I have ever heard about them suggests that their supposed charter >is to rate any and every film submitted. The fee is supposedly only to >cover their costs. Unless I am much mistaken (always possible), refusing to >rate a film would signal a major shift in their policy, the sort of shift >they typically make over Jack Valenti's heavily pummelled body. This discussion is ignoring a simple solution the MPAA can use to solve the problem. If pornographic films are submitted for rating, the MPAA can simply give them an X rating. This would leave NC-17 in the region between R and X. As I understand it, the X is still a valid rating that the MPAA can assign; the reason that pornographic films are able to use it is that it is the only rating that the MPAA never copyrighted.* Brian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ * The source for the copyright information is an article in the SJ Mercury news that I read a few months ago, but I don't remember the date offhand. It think it was a Sunday paper, if anyone wants to check.