Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!acsu.buffalo.edu From: dmark@acsu.buffalo.edu (David Mark) Newsgroups: rec.birds Subject: Re: Contact Notes of Winter Birds in Seattle Message-ID: <47500@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> Date: 26 Nov 90 03:39:04 GMT References: <11634@milton.u.washington.edu> <1990Nov26.005512.16482@massey.ac.nz> Sender: news@acsu.Buffalo.EDU Organization: SUNY Buffalo Lines: 21 Nntp-Posting-Host: autarch.acsu.buffalo.edu In article <1990Nov26.005512.16482@massey.ac.nz> A.S.Chamove@massey.ac.nz (A.S. Chamove) writes: >I think a chickadee is what the rest of the rest of the world calls a Tit. > Of course, what Mr. Chamove probably meant was the rest of the _English_S Speaking_world_. But typical members of genus Parus are called chickadees in Canada, too, so they are "chicakdees" in predominantly-English-speaking countries totalling almost 300 million people, and "tits" in the UK (<< 100M). And it hardly seems relevant if they are referred to as "tits" in the antipodes, since they are not native there, nor introduced in Australia (are any Parus established in New Zealand). Incidentally, they are 'Mesanges*' in French, '-mees' in Dutch, '-meise' in German, and '-mes' in Swedish (compound names), which I guess is where the 'mouse' part comes from in the American term 'Titmouse' for crested members of Parus. * accent-acute sur le premier 'e' David Mark dmark@acsu.buffalo.edu