Path: utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!bwdls61.bnr.ca!bwdls58!bwdlh490!hwt
From: hwt@bwdlh490.BNR.CA (Henry Troup)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: Shuttle question
Message-ID: <4985@bwdls58.UUCP>
Date: 29 Nov 90 15:26:46 GMT
References: <37200@nigel.ee.udel.edu> <1990Nov19.140100@alazif.cxo.dec.com> <3795@cuisun.unige.ch> <40040@ut-emx.uucp> <1990Nov26.113837@alazif.cxo.dec.com> <523@newave.UUCP>
Sender: news@bwdls58.UUCP
Reply-To: hwt@bwdlh490.BNR.CA (Henry Troup)
Distribution: world
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Lines: 13

In article <523@newave.UUCP>, john@newave.UUCP (John A. Weeks III) writes:

|>Abort Once Around - The shuttle has enough energy to limp around to Edwards
|>or KSC, but not enough for the desired orbit (or any orbit, for that matter).

Has a shuttle ever been landed at KSC?  My local radio station reported that
the last flight (the classified one - Atlantis? STS-38?) landed at KSC, but
they also reported that the greenhouse effect causes the ozone hole :-( and
I was off-net for a few days about then :=(
            
Henry Troup - BNR owns but does not share my opinions | The .signature is the
P.O. Box 3511, Stn. C. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4H7| lowest form of humour
uunet!bnrgate!hwt%bwdlh490 HWT@BNR.CA +1 613-765-2337 |