Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway
From: pepke@ds1.scri.fsu.EDU (Eric Pepke)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: Posting re. Andrea Dworkin
Message-ID: <1459@sun13.scri.fsu.edu>
Date: 26 Nov 90 17:44:23 GMT
References: <272090CA.26470@ics.uci.edu> <1741@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> <45691@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> <3039@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>
Organization: Florida State University, but I don't speak for them
Lines: 19
Approved: tittle@ics.uci.edu
Nntp-Posting-Host: zola.ics.uci.edu

In article <3039@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> falk@peregrine.Eng.Sun.COM (Ed Falk) writes:
>I can easily see the fundies getting ahold of this law and using it to
>ban "On Our Backs" or "Our Bodies Ourselves"

Dworkin herself is opposed to _On Our Backs_, so it is not neccessary for
fundamentalists to intervene.

In her speech at FSU, she stated that she was "appalled" by what _On Our
Backs_ was doing.

Incidentally, did my earlier article about the circularity of
Dworkin's argument make it out here, or did it, like so many of my
early articles to this newsgroup, vanish without trace into the
shared-responsibility blameless void?

[I got the article and posted it last week.  If you saw it, send email
to Pepke.  Thanks, --CLT]

-EMP