Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway
From: gazit@cs.duke.EDU (Hillel Gazit)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: what feminism has done FOR men
Message-ID: <659351755@lear.cs.duke.edu>
Date: 26 Nov 90 17:28:39 GMT
References: om> <657517070@lear.cs.duke.edu> <kaveh.658769285@s.ms.uky.edu>
Organization: Nefolet shel nemushot (Fallout of Wimps)
Lines: 20
Approved: tittle@ics.uci.edu
Nntp-Posting-Host: zola.ics.uci.edu

Somebody wrote:
>>In a situation where there is a record number of divorce cases, and
>>men are the ones who pay, in *most* cases, child's support (and in
>>some case alimony), Judy tells us that men don't have to be bread
>>winners anymore...

In article <kaveh.658769285@s.ms.uky.edu> (Kaveh Baharestan) writes:
>That doesn't mean that they PAY anything.

That means that they are harassed and they are under *pressure* to earn.

>That's true only if he pays alimony, and then not really.  A while
>back I got some stats on divores.  The man's quality of living goes up
>30% and the woman's (who usually has the kids) goes down 60%.  Note: I

That means that marriage is a better deal for a woman than for a man.
When the marriage is over then she loses that better deal.

She can work as hard as a man, and die as young, but for some
reason (in most cases) she is not very interested in the deal...