Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!mintaka!bloom-beacon!ora!daemon
From: wilber@aludra.usc.edu (John Wilber)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: Female human aesthetics
Summary: Collectivization of Genders?
Message-ID: <13359@chaph.usc.edu>
Date: 29 Nov 90 21:02:36 GMT
References: <658245246@lear.cs.duke.edu> <1990Nov11.171709.25842@arris.com> <17316@netcom.UUCP>
Sender: ambar@ora.com (Jean Marie Diaz)
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 14
Approved: ambar@ora.com

In article <17316@netcom.UUCP> ames!claris!netcom!avery@ncar.ucar.EDU (Avery Colter) writes:
>I sense a very broad collectivization of the genders which seems to
>stand in stark contrast to the whole core of our capitalist system.

Just what does this mean?  Is "collectivization" the same thing as
segregation?  Or is it sexism?  Or is it sexual integration?

What makes you think we have a "capitalist system"?  We have a mixed
economy (unfortunately) where it is possible for the government to
enforce various social norms on the population.  Is it the government
intervention you are complaining about?  Or is it private groups (like
companies, churches, clubs, etc.)?  Is this even a complaint?

Just Wondering.