Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!decvax.dec.com!ima!dirtydog!suitti
From: suitti@ima.isc.com (Stephen Uitti)
Newsgroups: comp.benchmarks
Subject: Re: ECL box (More issues of benchmarking)
Message-ID: <1990Dec03.191655.12565@dirtydog.ima.isc.com>
Date: 3 Dec 90 19:16:55 GMT
References: <43720@mips.mips.COM> <1990Dec1.210209.27344@rice.edu>
Sender: news@dirtydog.ima.isc.com (NEWS ADMIN)
Reply-To: suitti@ima.isc.com (Stephen Uitti)
Organization: Interactive Systems, Cambridge, MA 02138-5302
Lines: 27

[various people have quoted:]
>Wasting more bandwidth on a trivial benchmark.
>	echo 2^5000/2^5000 | /bin/time bc

IBM RS/6000 320          4.4    de5
DECstation 5000/200      6.0    de5
DECsystem 5810           6.2    de5
Cray XMP (Unicos)        8.6    de5
SPARCstation 1+         12.2    de5
DECstation 2100         12.8    de5
DECstation 2100         13.4    juan
SPARCstation SLC        15.4    meissner
SPARCstation 1          16.0    juan
SPARCstation SLC        44.5    zeeff
Sun 3/50                45.9    zeeff
MicroVAX ?              75.7    de5
RC6280                  2.8     mgj
MIPS M/2000             6.0
MIPS RS2030            10.0

my new entires:

Compaq 486/25 ISC 2.2  11.2     sku (11.2 real,  9.1 user, 0.1 sys)
Compaq 386/33 ISC 2.2  12.5     sku (12.5 real, 12.1 user, 0.1 sys)
Compaq 386/25 ISC 2.2  16.8     sku (16.5 real, 16.1 user, 0.1 sys)
Zenith 386/20 ISC 2.2  86.6     sku (86.6 real, 84.6 user, 0.6 sys)
(This Zenith really is slow - its RAM is on the AT bus...)


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com