Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!pollux.usc.edu!kjh
From: kjh@pollux.usc.edu (Kenneth J. Hendrickson)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: PC mag review comments
Message-ID: <28585@usc>
Date: 3 Dec 90 06:18:52 GMT
References: <1990Dec03.011952.15024@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
Sender: news@usc
Organization: EE-Systems, USC, Los Angeles
Lines: 24
Nntp-Posting-Host: pollux.usc.edu

In article <1990Dec03.011952.15024@mthvax.cs.miami.edu> wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu (David Lesher) writes:
>We're preaching to the choir. We know how well the Blazers work.

How well does the T2500 work in V.32 mode?  Does it have V.42?  V.42bis?

Does the T2500 have V.22bis for 2400 bps?  V.22 for 1200 bps?
212A for 1200 bps?  Bell 103 for 300 bps?

How well does the T2500 work in V.22bis mode (2400 bps)?

(I don't need PEP now, but I'm willing to pay more for a modem that
actually works.  I'm returning the Practical Peripherals PM9600SA.)

What is the receiver sensitivity?

--

Does anybody have these specs for the Practical Peripherals PM9600SA?
Practical Peripherals was obviously so ashamed of their specs that they
declined to publish them in TFM.

-- 
favourite oxymorons:   student athlete, military justice, mercy killing
Ken Hendrickson N8DGN/6       kjh@usc.edu      ...!uunet!usc!pollux!kjh