Xref: utzoo gnu.emacs.help:468 comp.emacs:9650
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!AI.MIT.EDU!rms
From: rms@AI.MIT.EDU (Richard Stallman)
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help,comp.emacs
Subject: Emacs and Scheme
Message-ID: <9012011844.AA10842@mole.ai.mit.edu>
Date: 1 Dec 90 18:44:56 GMT
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Followup-To: gnu.emacs.help
Organization: Gatewayed from the GNU Project mailing list help-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu
Lines: 4

I think that Emacs Lisp as it is does its job; I don't think that
switching to Scheme would be a great improvement.  It would break
large amounts of code.  Even if it were a large improvement, we could
not spare the effort to write the interpreter or convert the code.


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com