Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!linac!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!apple!vsi1!daver!tscs!tct!chip
From: chip@tct.uucp (Chip Salzenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: 2.0 vs. 2.1 ifdef?
Message-ID: <275C6CFC.3B1@tct.uucp>
Date: 5 Dec 90 03:43:56 GMT
References: <1990Nov29.123514.2075@odi.com>
Organization: Teltronics/TCT, Sarasota, FL
Lines: 8

Cfront 2.1 features aren't necessarily GraultCorp 2.1 features.  The
ifdef should be based on the real change: compliance with the ARM.
Since it's too late for that, I'd suggest an externally defined macro
until the ANSI committee invents a macro to indicate conformance.
-- 
Chip Salzenberg at Teltronics/TCT     <chip@tct.uucp>, <uunet!pdn!tct!chip>
      "I'm really sorry I feel this need to insult some people..."
            -- John F. Haugh II    (He thinks HE'S sorry?)


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com