Xref: utzoo comp.lang.fortran:4285 comp.lang.c:34515
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!charon!dik
From: dik@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Fortran vs. C for numerical work (SUMMARY)
Message-ID: <2644@charon.cwi.nl>
Date: 5 Dec 90 01:54:00 GMT
References: <7339@lanl.gov> <184a59d8.ARN0ebd@pilhuhn.uucp> <14651@smoke.brl.mil>
Sender: news@cwi.nl
Followup-To: /dev/null
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 11

(Yes, I can also play with Followup-To.  Apparently Doug Gwyn does not want
to have a discussion about the merits of C version Fortran in the C group.
This is the second time such a thing happened to my followup, but I gave an
answer to the following remark; you can find it in comp.lang.fortran.)

In article <14651@smoke.brl.mil> gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes:
 > Anyway, discussions about code optimization should have little to do
 > with selection of a programming language.
--
dik t. winter, cwi, amsterdam, nederland
dik@cwi.nl


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com