Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!gatech!mcnc!uvaarpa!murdoch!astsun8.astro.Virginia.EDU!gl8f
From: gl8f@astsun8.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: Fortran vs. C for numerical work (SUMMARY)
Message-ID: <1990Dec5.071121.23218@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Date: 5 Dec 90 07:11:21 GMT
References: <7339@lanl.gov> <184a59d8.ARN0ebd@pilhuhn.uucp> <14651@smoke.brl.mil>
Sender: news@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
Organization: Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia
Lines: 8

In article <14651@smoke.brl.mil> gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes:

>Anyway, discussions about code optimization should have little to do
>with selection of a programming language.

Great. I'll use my Cray allocation running interpreted Smalltalk.

:-)


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com