Xref: utzoo comp.lang.lisp:4064 comp.lang.scheme:1842
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!ogicse!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!percy!data!kend
From: kend@data.UUCP (Ken Dickey)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.scheme
Subject: Re^2: Numerical Gotcha's ...addendum
Keywords: Interval Arithmetic, Bignums, Rationals, FLonums
Message-ID: <435@data.UUCP>
Date: 5 Dec 90 19:32:43 GMT
References: <433@data.UUCP> <18468@yunexus.YorkU.CA>
Organization: Microcosm, Beaverton, OR
Lines: 23

oz@yunexus.yorku.ca (Ozan Yigit) writes:

>In article <433@data.UUCP> kend@data.UUCP (Ken Dickey) writes:
>>After that, Guillermo J. Rozas (a.k.a. Bill, JINX) sent me the
>>new C-Scheme results.

>What does "new" results mean?  Are they due to a bugfix, or
>some optimization switch, or what?


"New" means "results received later" than "old".  I also strongly
suspect that the compiler version is newer.


The tagging I received with the results was:	[reporter]

  C-Scheme  7.0 				[Oliver Laumann]
  C-Scheme  "Microcode 11.56, Runtime 14.104"   [Guillermo J. Rozas]

Perhaps they can fill in the version designator blanks.


-Ken Dickey


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com