Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!alberta!oha!tony
From: tony@oha.UUCP (Tony Olekshy)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.perl
Subject: Re: Xenix 386 Out of memory
Message-ID: <456@oha.UUCP>
Date: 3 Dec 90 09:56:01 GMT
References: <270@carssdf.UUCP> <455@oha.UUCP> <1990Dec2.194050.7680@robobar.co.uk>
Organization: Olekshy Hoover & Associates Ltd., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lines: 25
In-Reply-To: Message <1990Dec2.194050.7680@robobar.co.uk> dated 2 Dec 90 19:40:50 GMT

In message <1990Dec2.194050.7680@robobar.co.uk>, ronald@robobar.co.uk
(Ronald S H Khoo) writes:
>
> Eh... I didn't *intend* to insult anyone, but it looks like I have.
> It *was* meant to be half humorous, but I guess reading it again,
> it doesn't sound it.  Please accept my apologies.  Seriously though,
> gcc does compile net.sources a whole lot more cleanly than MSC does,
> and often more correctly...

No, I apologize for making you feel that you had insulted anyone, for not only
were you not insulting but I agree with you!  That's why I said I was surprised
when 41 just dropped in.  I too have had difficulty with MSC before. Although,
when I did some Xenix 286 development work, I came away feeling that all
developers should have to use it.  If you can make it run there, you can make
it run anywhere.

So, since each of us probably should have used a distasteful but useful smiley
on those last two postings, here's three: ;-) ;-) ;-)  Those of us of British
descent who apologize all the time (it's been rumoured to be the national
sport of Canada) now return you to your regularly scheduled newsgroup...

--
Yours etc., Tony Olekshy.       Internet: tony%oha@CS.UAlberta.CA
				  BITNET: tony%oha.uucp@UALTAMTS.BITNET
				    uucp: alberta!oha!tony


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com