Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!b.gp.cs.cmu.edu!Ralf.Brown@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU
From: Ralf.Brown@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: Microsoft Assembler Complaints
Message-ID: <27591bd9@ralf>
Date: 2 Dec 90 14:20:57 GMT
Sender: ralf@b.gp.cs.cmu.edu
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science
Lines: 12
In-Reply-To: <9385@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>

In article <9385@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>, c164-bd@katerina.uucp (John D. Mitchell) wrote:
}mean that it's no longer a one-pass assembler.  Both SLR's OPTASM and
}Borland's TASM are very fast and they use a multi-pass system.

Er....	TASM 1.0x was one-pass; TASM 2.0 is normally one-pass, but will make
multiple passes if you use certain features or give a command-line switch.

--
UUCP: {ucbvax,harvard}!cs.cmu.edu!ralf -=- 412-268-3053 (school) -=- FAX: ask
ARPA: ralf@cs.cmu.edu  BIT: ralf%cs.cmu.edu@CMUCCVMA  FIDO: 1:129/3.1
Disclaimer?    |   I was gratified to be able to answer promptly, and I did.
What's that?   |   I said I didn't know.  --Mark Twain