Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!sdcc6!sdbio2!cleland From: cleland@sdbio2.ucsd.edu (Thomas Cleland) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Sorry Guys, There is NO WAY! Message-ID: <14654@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> Date: 3 Dec 90 08:35:39 GMT References: <16321@brahms.udel.edu> <25671@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> <36454@cup.portal.com> Sender: news@sdcc6.ucsd.edu Reply-To: cleland@sdbio2.ucsd.edu (Thomas Cleland) Organization: University of California, San Diego Lines: 43 Nntp-Posting-Host: sdbio2.ucsd.edu > [...] > And then there's the December '90 Byte article which says that > the 3000UX easily outperforms the Mac II, the NeXT, and a 386 > at Unix. > >When BYTE magazine either ignores or comments only "en passant" re: the Amiga, >BYTE is perceived by the Amiga community as being lower than whale turds. > >When BYTE magazine publishes a noteworthy comment re: the Amiga, BYTE suddenly >becomes "THE WORD, THE TRUTH, THE GUIDING LIGHT TO ALL KNOWLEDGE." > >You figure. :-) > Figuring... BYTE speaks for the _I_ndustry, no mystery why Amigaphiles crave Amiga coverage within its pages. Every word about the Amiga in BYTE brings a little more discomfort to those who would happily write the Amiga off as less than it is. It's a good rag, I gues I'd say that *when they say anything it is usually reasonably fair and accurate* (even if they bend over backwards to avoid soiling their reputation in the prejudiced eyes of others). It's the ignoring, the brushing-off that gets me. If BYTGE published an article critical of this or that Amiga product that'd be great (even if I disagreed). The worst is being not even considered significant. So I guess I don't find the Amiga attitude towards BYTE too contradictory. BTW, the word and the truth was revealed in December's BYTE, page 132... ;^) >Thad Floryan [ thad@cup.portal.com (OR) ..!sun!portal!cup.portal.com!thad ] Delighted. -- ---- Thom Cleland "It is easier tcleland@ucsd.edu to get forgiveness Amiga User's Group at UCSD than permission"