Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!ucselx!crash!pro-party.cts.com!seanc
From: seanc@pro-party.cts.com (Sean Cunningham)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Atari TT030 vs. Amiga 3000
Message-ID: <6058@crash.cts.com>
Date: 3 Dec 90 23:16:16 GMT
Sender: root@crash.cts.com
Lines: 26

In-Reply-To: message from ekrimen@ecst.csuchico.edu

 
While I'm going to refrain from thrashing you for your comment about
AmigaDOS...as a 2.0 user, I'm most pleased.
 
However, your comment about ProWrite couldn't be more false, unless they've
made it worse.  I've used PW v2.5 on a beta A3000 several months ago when I
worked at a dealership.  If that's slow, what kind of drugs have you been
taking?  
 
They're up to what, v3.0 or is it v3.5 now?  I'm sure they wouldn't have
slowed it down.
 
If you're all fired up to get a TT, get one.  But we'd rather contain our
discussions to topics worth mentioning...
 
Sean
 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .SIG v2.5 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
  UUCP: ...!crash!pnet01!pro-party!seanc       RealWorld: Sean Cunningham
  ARPA: !crash!pnet01!pro-party!seanc@nosc.mil     Voice: (512) 992-2810
  INET: seanc@pro-party.cts.com        ____________________________________   
                                    // | * All opinions  expressed herein |   
  HELP KEEP THE COMPETITION UNDER \X/  |   Copyright 1990 VISION GRAPHICS |   
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<