Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:73419 alt.religion.computers:2143
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!world!spike
From: spike@world.std.com (Joe Ilacqua)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,alt.religion.computers
Subject: Re: A3000UX competition
Message-ID: <SPIKE.90Dec5123248@world.std.com>
Date: 5 Dec 90 17:32:48 GMT
References: <86470@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <12003@hubcap.clemson.edu>
	<36449@cup.portal.com> <1990Dec2.153612.28555@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG>
	<36488@cup.portal.com> <36537@cup.portal.com>
Sender: spike@world.std.com (Joe Ilacqua)
Organization: Software Tool & Die
Lines: 15
In-Reply-To: thad@cup.portal.com's message of 4 Dec 90 12:22:45 GMT

In article <36537@cup.portal.com> thad@cup.portal.com (Thad P Floryan) writes:
<At this point in time, with SVR4 "here", any continued discussions of
>BSD vs. SysV are moot and should be dropped, but I felt a documented
<response was necessary due to Dan's claiming my comments were a "...
>complete travesty of the truth ...."

	At this point with 4.4BSD on its way with many new and
interesting features, I think the debate will go on.  And given the
facts that, (if all goes according to plan) 4.4BSD will be freely
availble in source form, and that it runs on the 386, 4.4BSD may be
the death of SYSV.

->Spike
-- 
The World - Public Access Unix - +1 617-739-9753  24hrs {3,12,24,96,192}00bps