Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!UMCVMB.MISSOURI.EDU!C503719 From: C503719@UMCVMB.MISSOURI.EDU (Baird McIntosh) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Sound Digitizers Message-ID: <901205.114803.CST.C503719@UMCVMB.MISSOURI.EDU> Date: 5 Dec 90 17:48:03 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Synthy EuroTechnoWack Beat, Inc. Lines: 16 In Message-ID: faheyr@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Bob Fahey ) said: >What exactly did Sunrize do to make the 3.0 incompatible with the older >units? (Does it have something to do with the internal volume control?) >Other than that, what other improvements have been made to the >hardware< >itself? Does it sample better or something? I haven't heard anyone claim that it samples better, though SunRize would probably say it does. The 'software-controlled input gain' feature is the problem with the 3.0 hardware because most software out now does not know about it. As to *my* 3.0 hardware, it seems to be broken in that all the samples I've done have their negative amplitudes chopped off. :-( | Baird McIntosh | c503719@umcvmb.missouri.edu <-or-> c503719@umcvmb.bitnet | | COOL DRIVING TECHNIQUE #11: No turn signals! That's right... NO SIGNALS! | | Wanna left turn? Right? Lane change? Parallel park? Screw the signals!|