Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!darrell!gaudi!zimmer.CSUFresno.EDU!erick From: erick@CSUFresno.EDU (Eric Keisler) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Sorry Guys, There is NO WAY! Keywords: AMIGA 3000 vs NEXT Message-ID: <1990Dec6.182200.25972@CSUFresno.EDU> Date: 6 Dec 90 18:22:00 GMT References: <25671@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> <21930@well.sf.ca.us> <14701@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> <21993@well.sf.ca.us> Reply-To: erick@zimmer.CSUFresno.EDU (Eric Keisler) Organization: California State University, Fresno Lines: 30 In article <21993@well.sf.ca.us> yoo@well.sf.ca.us (Young-Kyu Yoo) writes: >To Thom Cleland: > The Amiga newsgroup is indeed full of well-informed and intelligent >posters. No argument here! ;-) > The 030 Amigas are more expensive than the 040 NeXTstations. >...what it would take to make your 040 Amiga the same low price as the 040 >NeXTStation. > The real issue is price/performance. There are many machines much faster >than the NeXT or Amiga. But the NeXT beats nearly all of them in terms of >price/performance. The Amiga is a valiant challenger to NeXT. But it still >has a ways to go if it wants to match NeXT's price/performance. Look, why do *so many* people insist on comparing oranges to bannanas? The Amiga is a *C O L O R* system. There is no such beast as a 4 color monochrome Amiga *CPU*. All Amigas have color support and specialized graphics CPUs built in. If your are going to compare a NeXT to ANY Amiga, for god's sake at least use the NeXTStation Color system. Then REDO your price/performance math, write it down, and LOOK at what you just wrote, O.K.? Heck, there are *numerous* monochrome based systems that come in at a low price. But add color capability to many of those systems and WHAM-O, it's time for a second mortgage on the house. Of course a third mortgage would be required if you want to do any sort of animation or video graphics. --- Eric Keisler, CSU Fresno erick@zimmer.ucs.csufresno.edu