Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:73114 comp.sys.amiga.hardware:4853
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!
From: lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Speed of HardFrame/2000 and Quantum Q105S (problem) (longish)
Keywords: HardFrame, Quantum
Message-ID: <2302@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca>
Date: 1 Dec 90 19:13:05 GMT
Lines: 30
Return-Path: <lpami!lphillips>
To: van-bc!rnews

In <600@cbmger.UUCP>, peterk@cbmger.UUCP (Peter Kittel GERMANY) writes:
>In article <2279@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca> lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips) writes:
>>In <3989.659757130@lemsys.UUCP>, clemon@lemsys.UUCP (Craig Lemon) writes:
>>
>>>KS 1.2
>>>WB 1.3.2
>>
>>This is not a good idea, in general. Mixing releases can lead to all sorts of
>>subtle problems.
>
>Sorry Larry, you're normally right, but not in this point. It was
>officially stated by Commodore that you may mix KS 1.2/1.3 with WB 1.2/1.3
>in every possible combination! The only disadvantage with KS 1.2 is the
>loss of autoboot ability with a HD.
>
>This was though an exception. It will NOT apply to KS/WB 2.0 mixing with
>its predecessors, that's impossible.

I stand corrected, though if I were to run 1.2 KS and 1.3 WB, I would be
holding my breath most of the time, regardless of the assurances.  :-)

-larry

--
The only things to survive a nuclear war will be cockroaches and IBM PCs.
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ 
|   //   Larry Phillips                                                 |
| \X/    lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca -or- uunet!van-bc!lpami!lphillips |
|        COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322  -or-  76703.4322@compuserve.com        |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+