Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!psuvax1!rutgers!njin!limonce From: limonce@pilot.njin.net (Tom Limoncelli) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware Subject: Re: A3000/16 Message-ID: Date: 5 Dec 90 06:22:16 GMT References: <4551@umbc3.UMBC.EDU> <184e255a.ARN04328@adspdk.UUCP> Organization: Drew University/NJIN Lines: 20 In article <184e255a.ARN04328@adspdk.UUCP> hclausen@adspdk.UUCP (Henrik Clausen) writes: > In article <4551@umbc3.UMBC.EDU>, cs472119 writes: > >[ If I plan on getting an '040 card for my Amiga 3000 is it better > > to have a /16 or a /25?] > So getting a 16 MHz is a good deal if you anticipate moving on to the > 68040 next year. Now I've heard that question answered both ways. The person that opposed the above answer was one of the designers of the Amiga 3000. Basically, the Zorro III bus is effected by the speed of the system so the faster you get your Amiga 3000, the faster the '040 will be at certain operations. -Tom -- tlimonce@drew.edu Tom Limoncelli "Flash! Flash! I love you! tlimonce@drew.bitnet +1 201 408 5389 ...but we only have fourteen tlimonce@drew.uucp limonce@pilot.njin.net hours to save the earth!"