Xref: utzoo news.groups:26107 comp.sys.att:11042 unix-pc.general:6694 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!galaxia!dave From: dave@galaxia.Newport.RI.US (David H. Brierley) Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.sys.att,unix-pc.general Subject: Re: Reorganization of comp.sys.att (was: CFD: create comp.sys.3 Message-ID: <1092@galaxia.Newport.RI.US> Date: 3 Dec 90 14:26:57 GMT References: <8352@gollum.twg.com> <36346@cup.portal.com> <947@trac2000.ueci.com> Organization: Dave's Very Own Personal System Lines: 35 I won't bore you with thousands of lines of included articles, just my 2 cents worth. I am strongly in favor of creating a new main-stream group to *replace* the existing unix-pc.* hierarchy. My primary reason for this is to solve the problem of poor connectivity. There are several major sites that refuse to carry the unix-pc groups because they are not part of the main-stream and as a result there are many isolated pockets of activity. Since the unix-pc (aka pc-7300, aka 3b1) has been officially abandoned by ATT, the newsgroup is the primary means of support available to most of the owners of the machine. Improved connectivity for a group designated for discussion of this machine would greatly benefit all of the people who own one. I think the issue of reorganizing comp.sys.att into multiple sub-groups is a separate but not completely un-related issue. Some people seem to strongly support a reorg so I am therefore changing my original position and am now coming out in favor of the name 'comp.sys.att.3b1'. I am also in favor of a moderated sources group called 'comp.sources.3b1'. When I orginally proposed a moderated sources group I volunteered to act as moderator and I am still willing. I am also seeking volunteers to act as co-moderators so that we can avoid problems in the future. I envision my role as moderator as simply a filter to ensure that all of the postings are either source programs or patches. In summary, I think we should proceed with creating comp.sys.att.3b1 and comp.sources.3b1 (moderated). The issue of attempting a reorganization of the other ATT machines into subgroups can be dealt with later but by naming this group as a subgroup of c.s.a we have paved the way for the reorg (or at least we have not done anything to block it). Let's Vote! -- David H. Brierley Home: dave@galaxia.Newport.RI.US Work: dhb@quahog.ssd.ray.com Can I be excused, my brain is full.