Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:11051 unix-pc.general:6704
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cica!iuvax!templon
From: templon@copper.ucs.indiana.edu (jeffrey templon)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,unix-pc.general
Subject: oh geez, is it .att.3b1 or .3b1
Message-ID: <76015@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>
Date: 4 Dec 90 03:12:09 GMT
Sender: news@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu
Organization: Indiana University, Bloomington IN.
Lines: 25


Well, the last poster tied it up - my summary (see previous post) says 4
specifically want comp.sys.3b1 and four specifically comp.sys.att.3b1
(with 6 more who did not care.)

How about a mini-vote, just on the NAME, with the two choices being

comp.sys.3b1

			and

comp.sys.att.3b1

I don't think any other name has a chance in hell, so I'll ignore them.
The source group name seems unanimous, comp.sources.3b1.

Please mail (e-mail) your vote to me.  Send something very close to
'I vote for comp.sys.3b1' or 'I vote for comp.sys.att.3b1'.

This is the last remaining issue that I see. There are very few disagreements
about other things.  I will tabulate the votes after work Wednesday, to try
and get all this to news.groups so we can have as little overlap with xmas
as possible in the vote period.

					Jeff