Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:11072 unix-pc.general:6741
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!trac2000!das13!dave
From: dave@das13.snide.com (Dave Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,unix-pc.general
Subject: Re: oh geez, is it .att.3b1 or .3b1
Message-ID: <1465@das13.snide.com>
Date: 5 Dec 90 02:11:32 GMT
References: <76015@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <1990Dec4.133943.327@swbatl.sbc.com>
Followup-To: poster
Organization: Snide Inc. - Folcroft, PA
Lines: 11

In article <1990Dec4.133943.327@swbatl.sbc.com>, dwn@swbatl.sbc.com (David Neill-OKCy Mktg 405-278-4007) writes:
> I mini-vote no for any *.att.* combination, but if that's the
> consensus, I'll real-vote to support it.
> 
Can you do that?  If so, I can honestly say that is EXACTLY how I feel.

DAS
-- 
David Snyder @ Snide Inc. - Folcroft, PA

UUCP:  ..!uunet!trac2000!das13!dave     INTERNET:  dave@das13.snide.com