Xref: utzoo unix-pc.general:6746 comp.sys.att:11076 news.groups:26201
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!n8emr!uncle!donlash
From: donlash@uncle.uucp (Donald Lashomb)
Newsgroups: unix-pc.general,comp.sys.att,news.groups
Subject: Re: Proposal on the unix-pc.* and comp.sys.att newsgroup changes
Message-ID: <1990Dec5.030749.20779@uncle.uucp>
Date: 5 Dec 90 03:07:49 GMT
References: <75436@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <57804@becker.UUCP>
Reply-To: donlash@uncle.UUCP (Donald Lashomb)
Organization: U.N.C.L.E.
Lines: 13

In article <57804@becker.UUCP> bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce D. Becker) writes:
>
>4) we begin to wonder what the fuss was all about, and
>gradually but inexorably come to the conclusion that it
>wasn't a very good idea after all.
>
>
>I'm pretty sure I'm in favor of number 4.

Me too, let's leave well enough alone.
The old saw "if it ain't broke don't fix it" might apply here.

Don		donlash@uncle.UUCP