Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:11102 unix-pc.general:6767
Path: utzoo!censor!comspec!becker!bdb
From: bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce D. Becker)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,unix-pc.general
Subject: Re: oh geez, is it .att.3b1 or .3b1
Message-ID: <58454@becker.UUCP>
Date: 6 Dec 90 00:00:47 GMT
References: <76015@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>
Organization: G. T. S., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Lines: 28

In article <76015@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> templon@copper.ucs.indiana.edu (jeffrey templon) writes:
|Well, the last poster tied it up - my summary (see previous post) says 4
|specifically want comp.sys.3b1 and four specifically comp.sys.att.3b1
|(with 6 more who did not care.)
|
|How about a mini-vote, just on the NAME, with the two choices being
|
|comp.sys.3b1
|
|			and
|
|comp.sys.att.3b1
|
|I don't think any other name has a chance in hell, so I'll ignore them.
|The source group name seems unanimous, comp.sources.3b1.

	You forgot "unix-pc.general" and
	"unix-pc.sources".

	I think in your rush you don't recall
	that there are a lot of us who have a
	bad feeling about all of this...

-- 
  ,u,	 Bruce Becker	Toronto, Ontario
a /i/	 Internet: bdb@becker.UUCP, bruce@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu
 `\o\-e	 UUCP: ...!uunet!mnetor!becker!bdb
 _< /_	 "Making the world safe for demography" - Western Culture (tm) Yoghurt