Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!jarthur!nntp-server.caltech.edu!rknop
From: rknop@nntp-server.caltech.edu (Robert Andrew Knop)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
Subject: Re: Memory expansion
Message-ID: <1990Dec4.204313.21572@nntp-server.caltech.edu>
Date: 4 Dec 90 20:43:13 GMT
References: <90338.130451EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu>
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Lines: 15

EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu (Ernie Oporto) writes:
>     Does anyone have any opinions on what would be better for me:
>          1) A GEORAM MEU  ($124.95)
>          2) A 1750 clone which is actually an upgraded 1764  ($199.95)
>               (upgraded to 512K like the geoRAM)

If you have a 128, go for the 1750 clone definitely.  GEORAM works
only with GEOS; the 1750 is a standard 128 device, and can be used
with DMA's etc.

If you have a 64, perhaps the GEORAM would be a better value for the
money, as the ram expansion is not so simple to access there anyway.

-Rob Knop
rknop@juliet.caltech.edu