Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!cs.widener.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!msuinfo!news From: draper@buster.cps.msu.edu (Patrick J Draper) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: 386 vs 386SX Message-ID: <1990Dec5.211220.13194@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> Date: 5 Dec 90 21:12:20 GMT References: <34117@netnews.upenn.edu> Sender: news@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu Reply-To: draper@buster.cps.msu.edu (Patrick J Draper) Distribution: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Michigan State University Lines: 29 In article <34117@netnews.upenn.edu> alas@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (David J. Alas) writes: >I was looking to pick up a 386 compatible system. Our company's interest >lies in productivity but at a reasonable cost. However, due to past problems >(as much as I'd like to get a clone), the people here only want IBM. >That being the case, I was wondering what the significant differences >are between the IBM PS/2 Model 55SX (386SX) and the Model 70 (386) >other than the slightly slower throughput speed of the SX. > > > >-- >______________________________________________________________________________ >-- David Alas alas@eniac.seas.upenn.edu >"If you pick up a starving dog and make it prosperous, it will not bite you. >This is the principal difference between a dog and a man." -- Mark Twain In my experience, running MS-DOS an SX is equally fast as a full 386. I think that is because MS-DOS is a 16-bit system, and runs in 16 bit real mode of 386's. Therefore there is no speed advantage from the 32 bit bus. I may be wrong, and I'm sure someone will correct me if I am. The SX can address 16 Mb of RAM vs. the full 386's 4gigabytes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Patrick Draper In times like these it is helpful to buster.cps.msu.edu remember that there have always been times like these. ------------------------------------------------------------------------