Path: utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!bwdls61.bnr.ca!bwdls58!mlord From: mlord@bwdls58.bnr.ca (Mark Lord) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: Why do large devices need SHARE? Message-ID: <5072@bwdls58.UUCP> Date: 6 Dec 90 23:12:12 GMT References: <05129019:48:27KRW1@lehigh.bitnet> Sender: mlord@bwdls58.UUCP Reply-To: mlord@bwdls58.bnr.ca (Mark Lord) Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Ottawa, Canada Lines: 37 In article <05129019:48:27KRW1@lehigh.bitnet> KRW1@Lehigh writes: ...excellent explanation omitted... CMNT)A1`.@\``M">2!4;VT@06QM>>@_`+@A`.C)_Z,D`8D>)@&Z' M)`%2NH``4KH6`%+H40",R%"ZA`!2NB$`4NB7_^FK_UN*!S#D0U-0`<-86E.)( MT^DA`+@-`.@)`+@*`.D#``$``*+&`;1`N0$`NL8!BQ[$`XP:,V([`\Z3_XZ+&2 `` end As you can see, NOSHARE.COM is much much smaller than SHARE, and can be loaded easily from your AUTOEXEC.BAT file. But be sure to remove SHARE.EXE from the root directory and also from the directory holding COMMAND.COM (unless you use 4DOS instead), to prevent DOS from automatically finding and loading it also (waste of mem). You'll know you've done it right as long as you are still getting the WARNING: SHARE MUST BE LOADED FOR LARGE MEDIA messages (or whatever they say). -- ___Mark S. Lord__________________________________________ | ..uunet!bnrgate!mlord%bmerh724 | Climb Free Or Die (NH) | | MLORD@BNR.CA Ottawa, Ontario | Personal views only. | |________________________________|________________________|