Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!rutgers!ucsd!scubed!warner
From: warner@scubed.com (Ken Warner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: What's going to happen to the IIcx
Message-ID: <490@scubed.SCUBED.COM>
Date: 6 Dec 90 16:04:39 GMT
References: <1990Nov30.214642.26534@Neon.Stanford.EDU> <1990Dec1.170223.7309@world.std.com> <1990Dec5.200743.5242@slhisc.uucp>
Sender: usenet@scubed.SCUBED.COM
Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.misc
Distribution: comp
Organization: S-CUBED, A Division of Maxwell Labs; San Diego CA
Lines: 15


    *In article <1990Dec5.200743.5242@slhisc.uucp> ken@slhisc.uucp (Ken Stamm) writes:
    **In article <1990Dec1.170223.7309@world.std.com> msmiller@world.std.com (Mark S. Miller) writes:
    **As for me (for what it's worth), I think I'll leave my IIcx as is and
    *Funny thing. In the current MacWeek, it seems more and more people are 
    *doing that very thing.

I just got a IIcx for ~$2700.  I'm happy as a clam.  No crashes.  No (well few)
incompatiblilities.  I've got 16 meg of memory and using Maxima to manage the
extra memory.  Got a cheap--$499--105 meg disk.  And two slots left to play
with after I put a TPD card in it.

I think the IIcx was the last good Mac.

Ken Warner