Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!agate!shelby!neon!pescadero.Stanford.EDU!philip
From: philip@pescadero.Stanford.EDU (Philip Machanick)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.wanted
Subject: Re: Screen/video card for IIcx
Message-ID: <1990Dec2.015524.3897@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 2 Dec 90 01:55:24 GMT
References: <1990Nov29.203816.17961@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: news@Neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System)
Reply-To: philip@pescadero.stanford.edu
Distribution: usa
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University
Lines: 17

In article <1990Nov29.203816.17961@Neon.Stanford.EDU>, I asked
Questions about portrait monochrome displays for a IIcx.

I received a summary of responses to a similar question, posted
to comp.sys.mac.hardware by Kathy Strong(*). In short: Ehman had a
negative report from one user, who went with Princeton Publishing
Labs MultiView II $892 with video card. Mirror PixelView I including
video card $567 still seems like a good deal to me, especially as
it had good reviews in the earlier summary.

Any more comments? I am particularly interested in hearing about the
Mirror PixelView I, since this seems a good choice.
-- 
Philip Machanick
philip@pescadero.stanford.edu

(*) If you'd like a copy of the summary, please e-mail.