Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!ge-dab.ge.com!tarpit!bilver!bill
From: bill@bilver.uucp (Bill Vermillion)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Xenix *is* Unix (WAS Re: ^3 What ....... Dell UNIX V.4)
Message-ID: <1990Nov30.174152.18632@bilver.uucp>
Date: 30 Nov 90 17:41:52 GMT
References: <2390@sixhub.UUCP> <244@n4hgf.Mt-Park.GA.US> <2319@tabbs.UUCP>
Reply-To: bill@bilver.UUCP (Bill Vermillion)
Organization: W. J. Vermillion - Winter Park, FL
Lines: 20

In article <2319@tabbs.UUCP> aris@tabbs.UUCP (Aris Stathakis) writes:
>In <244@n4hgf.Mt-Park.GA.US> wht@n4hgf.Mt-Park.GA.US (Warren Tucker) writes:
>>In article <2390@sixhub.UUCP> davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (bill davidsen) writes:

>>XENIX/386 sucks a lot of performance out of any platform it is on.
 
>          In fact, there is a release 2.3.4 on the cards which will have
>many new features i.e. korn shell, > 16MB ram support, and all the the
>current sls fixes all built in.

Would you care to tell us where you got that info.   One of my vendors who
is level (1 or 3 - whatever is the HIGH volume vendor) tells me that 2.3.2
is the end of the line, and I seem to remember that is what SCO said at one
time.

Have they changed their mind?

-- 
Bill Vermillion - UUCP: uunet!tarpit!bilver!bill
                      : bill@bilver.UUCP