Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnews!cbnewsm!mls From: mls@cbnewsm.att.com (mike.siemon) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: Comparing OLIT and Xt+ Summary: OPEN LOOK widgetry Message-ID: <1990Dec3.190657.4386@cbnewsm.att.com> Date: 3 Dec 90 19:06:57 GMT References: <9011290334.AA06617@zia.aoc.nrao.edu> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 35 In article <9011290334.AA06617@zia.aoc.nrao.edu>, cflatter@ZIA.AOC.NRAO.EDU (Chris Flatters) writes: > I believe that OLIT is Xt+, modified by Sun for X11R4. The OLIT code is the Xt+ code from release 2, modified at USL for X11R4 -- done last spring as the first stage in implementation of the new release 4 (to be generally available in mid-Dec). It was *after* we ported to the R4 server that we started to add new functionality (3D, mouseless operation,...) -- I suppose that these later changes will also become available with some future update to OpenWindows. I understand there *were* a few porting changes to fit the code with SunOS and with OpenWindows generally, but substantially OLIT *is* the USL code. > I compiled the examples from John Miller's "An OPEN LOOK at UNIX" with > only one problem (if you don't count getting the source off the 5-1/4 > inch floppy fixed in the back cover): one of the files was missing a header. > I would be surprised if there were any really significant problems in Oddly enough, I got the same error using the latest XWIN and Xt+, the scrollbar example was missing a definition of XtNtitle, which requires including Shell.h; I presume this is related to header differences from the R3-to-R4 change. Anyway, I recommend Miller's book for a quick start in OPEN LOOK widgetry. If anyone needs the reference, it is published by M&T Books, Redwood City, CA, 1990; ISBN 1-55851-058-3 (for the book/disk combination Chris mentions; the book and the disk are also available separately (~057-5 for the book, ~059-1 for the disk). -- Michael L. Siemon In so far as people think they can see the m.siemon@ATT.COM "limits of human understanding", they think ...!att!sfsup!mls of course that they can see beyond these. standard disclaimer -- Ludwig Wittgenstein