Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!ames!sheba.arc.nasa.gov!schoch
From: schoch@sheba.arc.nasa.gov (Steve Schoch)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re:  Not impressed with MacX
Message-ID: <1990Dec4.200829.19787@news.arc.nasa.gov>
Date: 4 Dec 90 20:08:29 GMT
References: <9011290206.AA00343@lightning.McRCIM.McGill.EDU>
Sender: usenet@news.arc.nasa.gov (USENET Administration)
Reply-To: schoch@trident.arc.nasa.gov (Steve Schoch)
Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA
Lines: 15

In article <9011290206.AA00343@lightning.McRCIM.McGill.EDU>, mouse@LIGHTNING.MCRCIM.MCGILL.EDU writes:
|> I wouldn't simulate them.  I would have the X server provide a pointer
|> device with only one button.  That's what you have, after all.
|> 
|> Kludges to support broken clients that blindly assume the presence of
|> (at least) three buttons on the pointer device only ensure that said
|> broken clients don't get fixed.

Related question:

	I'm using twm.  I sometimes use it on a X server with a two-button
mouse.  Is there anyway to test for this in .twmrc and change the button
mapping?

	Steve