Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cmcl2!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89.0!Grant.Downey
From: Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (Grant Downey)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: SCA
Message-ID: <16230@bunker.UUCP>
Date: 4 Dec 90 16:27:11 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.UUCP
Reply-To: Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org
Distribution: misc
Organization: FidoNet node 1:129/89.0 - BlinkLink, Pittsburgh PA
Lines: 20
Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP

Index Number: 12314

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

Right now mine is to.  I'll have to get after Ed and see what we
can do about it.  Seriously I think that that is always a
running battle that SCA stations have with their main carriers. 
If you don't keep after them they will make the SCA lolwer and
lower.  t(I thought when we installed the right equipment that
thints would be more consistant.  What happens to me is that it
gets low and I'll call him up to talk to him about it and am
informed that everything is okay.  Of course when we hang up it
pops back up to where it should be for a couple of weeks and
then back tothe same thing.  Sound familiar?

 

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89.0!Grant.Downey
Internet: Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com