Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!brahms!ncpjmw From: ncpjmw@brahms.amd.com (Mike Wincn) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans Subject: Re: 10BaseT Wiring question Summary: Co-resident 10Base-T should be feasible. Message-ID: <1990Dec8.011255.29729@amd.com> Date: 8 Dec 90 01:12:55 GMT References: <677@nih-csl.nih.gov> Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting) Organization: Advanced Micro Devices; Sunnyvale, CA Lines: 32 In article <677@nih-csl.nih.gov> brunetti@dumbo.nih.gov (Jim Brunetti) writes: >Can anyone tell me if the 10BaseT spec has any mention of having multiple >data runs in the same sheath. We have run 4 pair to locations running Starlan >and were wondering if we could use the 2 unused pair for another connection. >Should we use separate cable runs for each connection? Will there be >crosstalk? Also I need to know the model number of the cable that AT&T >recommends for Starlan. Thanks. > Jim Brunetti brunetti@dumbo.dcrt.nih.gov It should be possible to use 10Base-T in bundles up to 25 pairs of 24 AWG wire, with any number of combinations of other services used on the other pairs without significant degradation of performance, either on the 10Base-T link or the other services. The standard does stipulate noise characteristics that a 10Base-T receiver is supposed to reject in favor of valid Manchester packets, and those characteristics are believed to be representative of a worst-case network noise environment, whether or not that noise arises from co-resident services, and this includes NEXT, FEXT, impulse noise, ringer hits, and other sources. There is no document that I know of which can perfectly anticipate all imaginable network operating conditions, or all realizable noise sources, and your particular network may or may not exceed conditions outlined in the standard. But insofar as various noise sources in your particular network do not exceed that described in the standard, you should have no trouble establishing a viable co-resident 10Base-T link. Having said that, I have not yet seen any new data on 10Base-T in 25-pair bundles, so I cannot yet comment on the success of the work done in drafting 10Base-T, and "existence proof" is the final arbiter. Mike Wincn ncpjmw@brahms.AMD.COM (408) 749-3156 DISCLAIMER: I speak for myself unless noted otherwise.