Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!linac!uwm.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!linus!raybed2!rayssd!anomaly!mpd
From: mpd@anomaly.sbs.com (Michael P. Deignan)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: trn, part 9
Keywords: trn
Message-ID: <567@anomaly.sbs.com>
Date: 7 Dec 90 03:26:01 GMT
References: <1990Nov29.174426.1308@quagga.ru.ac.za> <1320@digi.lonestar.org>
Organization: Small Business Systems, Inc., Esmond, RI 02917
Lines: 20

kgallagh@digi.lonestar.org (Kevin Gallagher) writes:

>Part 9 of trn arrived here somewhat truncated.  The last few lines are:

>Anyone else have this problem?

Yup.

On a similar note:

Since TRN appears to be a patched RN in its distributed form, why isn't TRN
merely distributed as a series of PATCHes against the RN source, instead
of another whole distribution? Seems to be a large waste of bandwidth.

MD
-- 
-- Michael P. Deignan, President     -- Small Business Systems, Inc. --
-- Domain: mpd@anomaly.sbs.com       -- Box 17220, Esmond, RI 02917  --
-- UUCP: ...uunet!rayssd!anomaly!mpd -- Telebit:  +1 401 455 0347    --
-- XENIX Archives: login: xxcp, password: xenix  Index: ~/SOFTLIST   --